Home HockeyBuzz Register Login
Calgary, AB • Canada • 29 Years Old • Male

Laughing Stock

Posted 2:39 AM ET | Comments 11
I can see the line-up at the hospital for broken ankles is getting pretty long, as people have been jumping off of the bandwagon at a tremendous pace.

Fresh off one of the worst sets of trades I have ever witnessed, the Calgary Flames lay a massive egg on the ice tonight against the Minnesota Wild. Fortunately I did not have to bear witness to this game tonight so I really can not say a whole lot about it except for the fact that once again the Flames offence continues to fire on all cylinders (See: sarcasm).

The Flames were shut out for the 4th time since mid-January. They had been shut out zero times before that. They are not good and have a tough Devils team coming into the Dome on Friday night…yikes!

As for the trades, I am thinking Sutter must have taken the wrong pills this morning because these trades do not make an ounce of sense in my mind; except for maybe the Toskala deal, but it’s a stretch.

Toskala was once a good goalie, but that was a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away. He gives Kipper that added support in net and some veteran experience but is he really any better than McElhinney? He had 2 ½ decent seasons in San Jose but that was 3 years ago. His stats this year are appalling. A 3.66 GAA and a .874 SP%! I do not care what team you play for, that is horrendous. McElhinney’s stats: 3.22 GAA, .885 SP%. Equally bad; fine.

I do not blame Sutter for not watching any Leafs games but that’s what scouts are for. The Leafs are bad for a reason, and now the Flames have 3 of their forwards, their mediocre defenceman and their crappy goalie. Why make the trade? Where is the logic?

As for giving up on Dustin Boyd, let me take a quote from my Sunday blog:

Boyd has the most upside and would clearly bring back the most in return. The other option would be Langkow who garners a $4.5 million dollar cap hit for the next two seasons. In my opinion, if the Flames deal Boyd, they only give up on yet another up and coming player to early in his career. Like St. Louis, Giguere, Stillman, Lombardi and most recently Phaneuf, Dustin Boyd is a Flames draft pick who is starting to show signs of his potential. Trading another one of our young guys for an older more experienced player (Jokinen last year, Stuart a couple years back, etc.) only sets this franchise further back.

And what did the Flames do? Exactly what they have been doing for the past 15 years; giving up on players way too quickly, but this time they received next to nothing in return, so maybe I was a tad off on the market value of Boyd. But still, why deal him if you are not going to get anything. This move pisses me off almost as much as the next deal does.

Why is Sutter determined to get older and slower? Steve “Freakin” Staois! He is 35 years old and has a cap hit of $2.6 million next year. Aaron Johnson, when used, is 9 years younger and made just over half a million dollars. Johnson was a decent ‘fill-in guy’ and made next to nothing, so why get rid of him? Staios is a 6th/7th defenceman and slow as molasses.

I had numerous Oiler fans laugh in my face today when they heard this deal, and rightfully so as Darryl Sutter is slowly making the Flames the laughing stock of the NHL.

This has been,

Newman on the Flames

Read more: http://calgaryontheflames.blogspot.com/
Filed Under:   calgary   flames   bandwagon   laughing  
March 4, 2010 9:02 AM ET | Delete
Honestly, I was shocked when I heard about Staios and Toskala. You nailed it dead on. Toskala also has quite the attitude problem. The one good player you did receive though was that "mediocre defenceman" Ian White. He's not a flashy player, but he is a very hard worker. On a horrible team like the Leafs, to lead them in - is no easy task. But otherwise, the only reason I could think he's done this is because he wants this team to go deep into the Playoffs. What do you think?
March 4, 2010 11:51 AM ET | Delete
It's a shame that I clicked on a blog named 'Laughing Stock', thinking it would be about the leafs.
March 4, 2010 12:45 PM ET | Delete
March 4, 2010 12:59 PM ET | Delete
Give the team time to gel. The Flames have made a lot of changes. They might just need some time to get the chemistry flowing, although time is running out on the season. Hmmm
March 4, 2010 2:41 PM ET | Delete
1dsa- Toskala, Stajan, Hagman, White...it's an easy mistake to make.
March 4, 2010 5:02 PM ET | Delete
Time to gel?? There is no time and thats the problem. And yes Sutter did make this move to go deep in the playoffs, or at least im assuming thats why he would make any deal. Only problem is that the Flames will not make the Playoffs
March 4, 2010 5:38 PM ET | Delete
So, we traded for the worst goalie in the league, gave up Boyd for absolutely nothing, got an old, slow, expensive vet D-man, and gave up a 3rd round pick. Yup. That'll make us contenders.
March 4, 2010 5:47 PM ET | Delete
Rinklighter: BINGO!
March 5, 2010 10:01 AM ET | Delete
Probably like you guys, I know a lot of flames fans, not one...not ONE was happy about the trades. Most could give or take Toskala and some just shrugged about Boyd but the Staios Deal feels like a kick in the teeth.
March 5, 2010 11:09 AM ET | Delete
March 5, 2010 12:59 PM ET | Delete
I'd be more upset about Toskala... seriously. If the guy could at least admit that he's not playing well and do something to correct it, it wouldn't be as infuriating as his insistence that he's a good goalie, and that he knows what he's doing, and that he's a starter in the NHL... not f---ing with a .870 SV% It made me miss Andrew Raycroft...
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to leave a comment.

Blog Archive