Home HockeyBuzz Register Login
"Covering Bolts Hockey "
" • Canada • 4 Years Old • Male
Outwit, Outplay, Outlast. While that may be the tagline for CBS’s popular show, Survivor, it is also exactly what the Montreal Canadiens did to the Tampa Bay Lightning last night. That loss, giving the Bolts a record of 3-3 on my little stretch, all but puts the Lightning out of contention. Unless drastic changes are made, we aren’t going to be seeing playoff hockey in Tampa. From the outside, the situation in Tampa may not be as dire as I am making it out to be. That said, as a fan, I am simply fed up. I’m fed up with a few players who consistently don’t put in enough effort, I’m fed up with our coaching staff’s inability to adapt and I’m fed up with management for not realizing how bad this situation is.

For those of you who read my works frequently, you know that I am typically not this negative. That said, last night’s game was my last straw. In this post-game blog, I won’t be doing my typical analysis. This blog will focus on the bigger picture and how this Habs game is in fact a microcosm of it. Take a look at the Bolts’ road record right now. It’s sitting at a dreadful 6-15-3. What does that mean? It means that this group is barely on pace to get into double digits in the road W column. That’s absolutely brutal. To put that into perspective, the Edmonton Oilers, who finished dead last in the league last season, had 12 road wins. It’s just plain unacceptable. For Steve Yzerman to come out and say that he’s not surprised with where the team is because he knew “that it was going to be tough this year” is absolutely ridiculous. I’d rather him come out and say that he is just as shocked as all of us.

Alright, I’ve come to my senses. I’m still fairly upset with this group but now let’s focus on the game that was played against the Montreal Canadiens.

There’s no doubt that the Bell Centre is a tough place to play. However, a lot of our team resides from the area and you typically see a heightened energy level because of it. Going into the first period, I was feeling pretty good. On this trip, I actually pegged this one as one of the easier wins. Of course, my predictions have been pretty terrible this season; but, I digress. When Lecavalier scored his goal to open the scoring, I thought that things were going to continue to go our way. The goal was the result of a really hard working play. Now, with 15 on the season, Vinny has a chance to put up some decent offensive totals. Wow, that was a pretty rosy assessment of our captain, but hold on. I’m not finished here. After scoring his goal, I thought Vinny had a tough night. He just looked lazy and disinterested. For a guy playing at home, you would think that he would have a little more saved up in the tank. Not so for number 4. My concerns for Vinny grow each day that I watch him. Sure, he does bring a lot of great things to this team, but it seems like after he scores, or chips in once or twice he gives up. We need a captain who doesn’t EVER give up.

The goal that tied things up for the Canadiens off Blunden’s stick pretty much summed up the goaltending that we’ve seen all season. Watching the replay, I had a tough time figuring out how there was any room to put that puck in. That’s one Garon HAS to have if he wants to be the number one guy for this team. The second that goal was in, my stomach dropped a little bit. The game was all but over. It was only moments later that the second goal was put in. We’ll get to that one in a second because I have A LOT to say about it. That was a moment that the Bolts could not afford. Any other team goes down 2-1 like that and I wouldn’t feel so bad, but this group, it was over.

Until the end of the game, there wasn’t any offense. For a team heading into the third period down by a goal, the Bolts didn’t generate a lot. How does a team with so much talent and supposed drive only generate 7 shots in the third period of a tight game? I don’t want to hear any excuses; it’s simply unacceptable. Anyways, the game ended 3-1 and that pretty much tells the story. Now, onto the next part of the game analysis (the catchy opening line did have a reason).

Outwit
This is where I am going to highlight the second goal that the Habs scored. What was it a result of? Steve Downie lost his mind out on the ice. The Montreal Canadiens are not a particularly physical team, or a dirty team, but they won the intimidation battle on that sequence. Personally, I didn’t like every hit the Habs dished out on that shift, but what’s done is done. The point of this is that the physical play knocked Steve Downie right off his game and he went nuts. He was chasing guys down for hits that weren’t presenting themselves and he just looked like a human wrecking-ball. His stupid play resulted in a good rush for the Habs in which they put the puck in the back of our net. Why did all this happen? The Habs kept their emotions in check; that’s something the Lightning failed to do.

Outplay
The first period this game wasn’t great for the Lightning, but it was far from the worst (I wouldn’t go as far as to say that it was “good,” as the coaches put it). After that period, things went downhill for our Bolts. The Canadiens outplayed us in every facet of the game. They got good goaltending, timely offense and solid defense. Even more than that, I want to highlight the puck battles and turnovers. I can count on one hand the number of puck battles the Lightning won in the second period. When that happens, you know it wasn’t a good night. Forget the puck battles, you win some, you lose some. What really concerns me is the turnovers. The blind passes, stupid giveaways and inconsistent passing all made for one of the ugliest displays of puck control in recent memory. Give credit to the Canadiens for creating these opportunities, but the Bolts have to be better.

Outlast
This one is pretty simple to explain. Sometimes in tight games, weird things happen. That didn’t occur tonight; the Canadiens held on until the end of the game to get their insurance and finally take home the two points. Randy Cunneyworth did a great job of keeping this group calm despite their lack of confidence. It’s tough to come back from a deficit, but the Lightning have got to give it a better shot than that. All I can say, again, is simply unacceptable.

Anyways, I’m in transit tomorrow so there won’t be a blog until late tomorrow night. It bodes well as the Bolts now have two days off before they take on the Vancouver Canucks at the Tampa Bay Times Forum. That will be a daunting test despite the fact that the Canucks will be playing their third in four nights. If I had to guess, the Bolts will be seeing Cory Schneider in net for the Canucks. I’ll have more on him and the team from Vancouver in my pre-game report. However, I will say this. Let’s hope that Schneider puts on a show for the Bolts a shuts us out. No folks, I have not gone insane. If that happens, maybe Steve Yzerman will make a call to Mike Gillis to make it so Cory doesn’t have to leave Tampa with the Canucks. A fan can dream, right?

Thanks for reading and have a good Sunday!

Follow me on Twitter for my latest blogs, Lightning news and random hockey thoughts:
@michaelstuart93
Filed Under:   tampa   bay   lightning   montreal   canadiens   game   review  
January 8, 2012 1:35 AM ET | Delete
May as well get to know some of the next draft picks this time around.
January 8, 2012 1:39 AM ET | Delete
Defense Griffin Rienhart, Jacob Trouba, Ryan Murray and Derrick Pouliot. Forwards Brad Vail and Pontus Aberg. Goaltenders Oscar Dansk and Andrei Vasilevski, but Vasilevski is an absolute stud.
January 8, 2012 2:20 AM ET | Delete
Mr. Yakupov, meet Mr. Stamkos. Mr. Stamkos, meet Mr. Yakupov. Question, let's say we end up in the bottom 5 and then win the lottery. Do you trade the number one pick? Or do you draft Yakupov despite needing D (he is the best player by a mile)?
January 8, 2012 7:20 AM ET | Delete
Yakupov is the best player, but it's not by a mile. It's a good and deep class. Grigorenko is a beast.
January 8, 2012 8:09 AM ET | Delete
Getting something done this year is not going to happen. Steevie Y came out and said don't expect anything big to happen due to the fact this team has NO depth. Draft picks are huge and more and more i see it we are truely 2 years away from being ther perenial playoff team he wants to build here. As the experts said last year i guess was a fluke.
January 8, 2012 8:15 AM ET | Delete
I have nothing to say about the game other then The Habs D gave us nothing, not like it seemed we put a huge effort to anyway. Our PP, well thats like a broken record, we kill half the penalty playing with th puck in our zone. The PP is a man adavantage right? Another note i've have whined about is, the Habs yesterday used 7 D and won 2 in a row doing so. I know our D are dropping like flies but how about giving it a shot Boucher! Remember the Pens series! Very frustrating
January 8, 2012 9:38 AM ET | Delete
I am not sold on those guys. I think a defenseman is the best was to go for us.
January 8, 2012 11:56 AM ET | Delete
Oomroy, I agree. We are really two years MINIMUM if you ask me. The problem I see here is the gap. We have St. Louis, Lecavalier, Malone then a huge gap before you get Stamkos, Connolly, Gudas, Barberio etc. That's a big problem right now IMO.
January 8, 2012 12:22 PM ET | Delete
Ashton, Conacher, Johnson are another year away from being an affective NHL line. Barberio, in my opinion is ready and could make an instant impact on our blueline as could Gudas. At the end of the season the only forwards we should retain are: St. Louis, Stamkos, Malone, Lecavalier (nobody will take him), Downie (if he keeps his cool), Thompson, Connolly and Tyrell.
January 8, 2012 12:25 PM ET | Delete
As for defense, we should keep: Brewer, Hedman and Gilroy. DON'T resign Kubina, Clark or Gervais. Trade Bergeron for a
January 8, 2012 12:25 PM ET | Delete
Bag of melted pucks and a discount on a punch in the face.
January 8, 2012 12:28 PM ET | Delete
Drop-kick both goalies to the curb and start over (if anyOne will take Garon, if not he's our backup). It's time to clean house.
January 8, 2012 2:46 PM ET | Delete
Agree with pretty much everything you've said there. Question, I was messaging a Habs fan a few days back. We got to talking about a Gomez/Lecavalier swap. There is no doubt that Vinny is the better player by a mile. His offer was Cammalleri and Gomez for Lecavalier . Would you make that deal? I would in a heartbeat. Despite Gomez being downright terrible, his contract is up in two years. Easy out.
January 8, 2012 2:48 PM ET | Delete
It wouldn't take me 1 billionth of a heartbeat to make that deal brother.
January 8, 2012 2:50 PM ET | Delete
I wouldn't even let them finish the sentence! Thconversation would be. Them "we take Lecavalier...." me "DONE!"
January 8, 2012 2:57 PM ET | Delete
Ahaaahaha that's funny. I thought I would be the only Bolts fan to make a trade that brought in Gomez.
January 8, 2012 3:08 PM ET | Delete
Yes the Gomez contract SUUUUUCCCKKKS, but it's SOOOOO much shorter!
January 8, 2012 3:58 PM ET | Delete
Guys, my STM jersey is a Vinny. I had high hopes of him this year plus he does have 15 goals! Plyus next year a 10 mil 3rd line center is priceless. joking of coarse, sadly not on the STM jersey
January 8, 2012 6:46 PM ET | Delete
Right you are, Artyukhin. It's not the dollar value on Vinny that's really killing us, it's the length.
January 8, 2012 8:44 PM ET | Delete
Does anyone have a clue on who is blocking the LA trade with us, according to Euks that is? More then likely just a rummor and that's all but it is nice to have some what of a hope at this point.
January 8, 2012 9:03 PM ET | Delete
I could speculate, but I don't have any hard information. Obviously the Lightning would be interested in defense and the Kings in offense. Out of LA, Johnson would make sense to me. According to multiple sources, he has been dangled out of LA before. He is exactly what the Bolts need. Out of here, Malone maybe? That one is more of a guess than anything. Johnson I'm pretty convinced.
January 8, 2012 11:06 PM ET | Delete
Bugsy is the most likely the one.
January 9, 2012 8:55 AM ET | Delete
Will Boucher be with the Lightning next year? Remember he comes from the Montreal organization and they are looking for a French speaking Head Coach and as I understand the only out Boucher has from his present contract is if the Montreal Head Coaching position is open.
January 9, 2012 10:14 AM ET | Delete
Where did you hear that? Me thinks you're making stuff up.
January 10, 2012 1:27 PM ET | Delete
Apparently Jeff Rimer of the CBJ TV crew was talking about it. He was the one who reported it, on tv. So he's putting his credibility on the line if that's not true. It might be. Anyways, I'm back now so I'll have a game review up tonight.
Notice to Internet Explorer Users
There is an issue with the form blow that will make it appear that nothing happens when you click the post message button below. To see your message, after you click the post message button, refresh this page. Sorry for the troubles, we hope to have it fixed soon.
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to leave a comment.

Blog Archive

01 Lightning News and Notes to Start December
02 Why Bolts Must Get Into Bobby Ryan Trade Discussions
02 Breaking News: Lightning Make Minor Trade with Panthers
03 10 Bold Predictions for Rangers vs. Lightning Game
04 Lightning Lose to Rangers: My Prediction Round Up
06 Simply Embarassing: Lightning Drop 5th Straight to Islanders
08 Lightning Beat Rangers to End Losing Streak - Mixed Bag
10 The 1-3-1 Returns: Flyers Take on Bolts at Wells Fargo
11 Lightning Fall to Flyers: The Slot Looks Like a Drive-Thru
12 From Bad to Worse + Lightning Sign Miettinen
14 Lightning Talk: Defensemen to Target in Free Agent Frenzy
14 Scenario
15 Bolts Squeeze By Flames Thanks to Dominant Second Period
17 Lightning Should Make a Push for Shea Weber
18 Bolts Down Blue Jackets + Rumor Round-Up
20 Why the Lightning WILL make the Playoffs This Season
22 Lightning Embarrassed by Sharks in San Jose: U-G-L-Y
22 Tampa Bay Lightning: I Want Your Opinions
23 Bolts vs. Avalanche: A Long-Winded Game Preview
24 Bolts Lose to Avalanche in Goalie Battle + Rumor Round-Up
25 Risky Business: Victor Hedman and Other Top-5 D-Men
26 Flyers vs. Bolts Shaping Up to be a Great Game -- Preview
27 Next 6 Games Vital for Lightning + My Predictions
27 Bryzgalov Shaky as Lightning Beat Up on Flyers
29 A Tale of Two Underperforming Teams: Bolts vs. Canadiens
29 A V for Vinny, a V for Victory: Bolts Down Habs 4-3
30 Bolts/Canes Preview + HB Hotstove Response + Rumor Update
31 Lightning Defeat 'Canes 5-2 on Phil Esposito Night