Home HockeyBuzz Register Login
I hate you, Toronto, ON • Canada • 27 Years Old • Male
As training camp approaches, there will be no shortage of forwards rumoured to be heading to the Toronto Maple Leafs in exchange for one of their excess defensemen. The two players currently being mentioned in the rumour mill, however, will command a little more than a spare part.

Those two players are Patrick Marleau, and Patrick Sharp.

Marleau enjoyed a comeback season in 2008-09, having perhaps his best all-around campaign in the National Hockey League. However, another abysmal display in the playoffs tarnished his accomplishments during the regular schedule, and as a result his captaincy was stripped in the off-season. While this no doubt lowers the 30-year-old’s (turns 30 in September) value, make no mistake, Marleau will not come cheap. The San Jose Sharks are well aware that without the added pressure, their former captain could return to his 80-point days.

But hey, this is Toronto. Nothing stops the center of the hockey universe from dreaming about acquiring star players. Not only do I think the Sharks would not trade one of their star players to a team in bare supply of assets, but I don’t think the Leafs are in need of a player like Marleau.

Considering the Leafs are still years away from realistically competing for the Stanley Cup, does it seem like a logical move to trade away a large portion of the Leafs’ assets for a player like Marleau? No way, Jose (sorry for that one).

Not only would Marleau be trending down by the time the Leafs are ready to compete, but Brian Burke would have to offer a significant deal in order to ply Marleau from the Sharks. Probably something like Ian White, a young scoring forward, and a draft pick. Quite simply, the Leafs are in no position to be trading for a first-line forward. If Burke is interested in acquiring a top-six player via trade, then he needs to target a second-line forward who won’t cost the farm.

In comes Patrick Sharp.

Sharp, who is just entering his prime at 27, had a 30-goal season derailed due to the injury bug in 2008-09. He’s somewhat of a late-bloomer, only finding his game during the 2007-08 campaign when he produced 36 goals and 62 points in 81 games. But offense is not the only facet of his game. Sharp can kill penalties and has proved to be a reliable two-way forward for the Chicago Blackhawks. In fact, the Sharks won 36 of the 61 games Sharp played last season. They only won 10 of 21 when he was absent (kudos to TheScore Sports Forecaster for that stat).

While not a proven commodity in the NHL, Sharp has the potential to put up 40 goals someday. If not, expect him to be a 30-30 guy throughout his prime years. He may not be first-line material, but he’s the kind of player you want on your second-line.

Not only that, but Sharp wouldn’t cost the Leafs a large portion of their assets. He’s younger, and his 3.9 million dollar cap hit is much more attractive than Marleau’s 6.3 million dollar price tag.

The Blackhawks appear to be primed for a Stanley Cup run, but one of the team’s most pressing needs is a stay-at-home defender to solidify the defensive zone coverage. So it begs the question: Would Stan Bowman be interested in trading Sharp for a defenseman like Jeff Finger and other assets?

Well, the Blackhawks have approximately 3 million in cap space. Considering Finger, who led the Leafs in blocked shots with 158 last season, makes $400K less than Sharp, the Blackhawks have nothing to lose. While it would require more than just Finger to get the deal done, the Leafs also have players to spare upfront. Does this not seem like a much more logical and realistic possibility compared to Marleau?

I also happen to think Sharp would look good alongside Mikhail Grabovski and Nikolai Kulemin. But maybe I’m getting ahead of myself now.

Also, I think I deserve a medal or something for that title. C’mon.

[email][email protected][/email]


Filed Under:   Sharp   Marleau   Leafs  
August 27, 2009 8:20 AM ET | Delete
Leafs are going to suck for awhile. They have nothing up front. Unless all their defence can squeeze in the nets to fill the holes Toskala has they'll be bad again this year. To pick up a good player you need to have something desired in exchange - Toronto doesn't have anything that others want. Burke will continue to bring in "his type" of players and they'll continue to suck -he's not your saviour. Burke highly over rated. He inherited his Anaheim team. He didn't build it.
August 27, 2009 8:49 AM ET | Delete
Pretty sure the Leafs have a few desirable players... its just they don't exactly want to move said desirables. Does it make sense to trade Kulemin for Sharp? No. Because Kulemin makes almost 3m less and could develop into almost a facsimile of sharp. Would the Blackhawks make such a trade? Its very conceivable. Would they trade Sharp for Jeff Finger, extremely doubtful as it wouldn't afford enough cap relief to justify moving a valuable player.
August 27, 2009 8:52 AM ET | Delete
Mentioning Jeff Finger in any kind of cap relief trade is more than a little optimistic. Yes, he played pretty well in his first year, but his role is reducing with the current blueline logjam and his contract is ghastly when you consider that he's a number 5 defenceman on most teams.
August 27, 2009 8:57 AM ET | Delete
I wrote a blog about acquiring Sharp earlier this summer, he is the best fit but Finger will not be part of the deal. White will be the centrepiece but it'd be nice to expand the deal to pawn off Stempniak too. Maybe we take back an overpaid asset. Reality is only White for Sharp would offer a sizeable enough cap savings to justify the loss of Sharp
August 27, 2009 12:14 PM ET | Delete
Yeah, I think White would def be part of any deal for Sharp. Problem is, Chicago in trading Sharp wont be looking to take back much in salary-thats the whole purpose of even considering moving Sharp. Any aquisitions they make will need to be players who are like White and who have deals already without fear of being RFA's next season as Chi is already aplumb with too any of those.
August 27, 2009 12:17 PM ET | Delete
jakester...that's such a huge misconception. Burke brought in Beachemin, Pronger, Niedermeyer, Selanne...among others. Are you saying Anaheim would have won the Cup without those guys? Give me a break.
August 27, 2009 6:51 PM ET | Delete
I was under the impression that the previous regime signed Niedermayer on.
August 27, 2009 8:48 PM ET | Delete
good read :)
August 27, 2009 8:49 PM ET | Delete
Message Postedand i 10000% agree with mcdivitt, aniheim wouldn't have made the playoffs without those guys
August 27, 2009 8:50 PM ET | Delete
especially scottie!
August 28, 2009 10:54 AM ET | Delete
You edited your posted and deleted my comments what a weak move. You have no stomach for sharp, accurate critisizm. If you want a medal how about the "Homer" award. Hawks need nothing from leafs other then draft picks but would give Campbell away for Shenn as a salary dump only. Anything else, well no happening especially the overpaid and not good enough Finger.
August 29, 2009 1:26 AM ET | Delete
Finger won't be in the deal. Nice title.
September 1, 2009 6:44 PM ET | Delete
jake Burke signed Niedermayer, Sleanne and traded for Beauchemin and Pronger yes the ducks had a solid young core from Murray before he got there but without those for they never come close to the cup
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to leave a comment.

Blog Archive