Home HockeyBuzz Register Login
Canada • 24 Years Old • Male
As I've posted at the end of many of my blogs, some friends and I do a weekly podcast on all things hockey and Oilers. One point we discussed at length was the expansion draft and how the Oilers will be affected.

A few days ago it came out that players with NMC's who are set to be UFA will have to be protected. This means that as of right now, the Oilers will have to protect Andrew Ference. While I think this guarantees the Oilers will buy him out, that becomes wasted cap space the following year.

As we discussed who the Oilers should protect, specifically on the back-end, my associate brought up the idea that the Oilers should only try and acquire one defenseman this season and to use a player like Mark Fayne on the second pairing.

While he was discussing this idea, I sat back and started to think who would be available in the top 5 draft next season but unfortunately he does have a point.

The Oilers can protect three defensemen. I think it's safe to assume those three will be Klefbom, Sekera (NMC), and whoever is acquired to play the right side on the top pairing. For argument sake, let's say the Oilers acquire Faulk and Vatanen. The Oilers would have to risk losing one of those players. For both of Faulk and Vatanen the Oilers would have to give up assets. It would be very risky to give up too much to acquire one of these guys, only to lose them after a year.

Do I want Fayne in my top 4... absolutely not. I'm not the biggest analytics guy. I will sometimes use them to make my point but I find a real danger when analytics contradict what my eye sees. While someone can tell me that when Fayne and Sekera were paired together they had the best possession stats out of any defensive pairing, I saw Sekera having to be the one to do the heavy lifting to move the puck up. On a good team, Fayne is a guy you want on your bottom pairing who you know can slot up when you need him. Asking him to play a full season in the top 4 is asking for trouble.

Another internal option is Brandon Davidson. Davidson's emergence was a welcome surprise last season. While he is a left shot, he did spend time on the right side last season. Defensemen don't develop in a straight line and I wouldn't recommend penciling him in to start in the top 4 next season.

Then we get into the free agency options. Demers would be a perfect solution in this regard. As a free agent he only costs the team money which wouldn't be the end of the world if he was grabbed by the Vegas team. However, every agent is also aware of the impending expansion and you can bet Demers doesn't sign unless he too get's a NMC.

We are about to begin Year 2 of Connor McDavid's ELC. Before we know it, the Oilers are going to offer him the contract that's going to change everything. The Oilers need to find a way to compete in the next couple years. For that reason I am not against Chiarelli taking a risk and acquiring a player he may only have for one year, providing they can make the playoffs.

The last thing to keep in mind is a Vegas team will be looking at 29 other teams for players. While it's easy to narrow in and worry about the Oilers roster, the fact is 29 other teams have the same worry, almost all of them have a better D core to choose from. But that will have to be the subject of another blog. My final point being, the last thing the team should be worrying about is losing what could be their #4 defenseman.

If you're interested in hearing our full conversation on Fayne, the Oilers D, and if Lucic is a better option than Pouliot, I invite you to check out our podcast.
https://soundcloud.com/do...ckey/downtown-hockey-ep-8

As always, thanks for reading.
Filed Under:   oilers   expansion   defense  
June 7, 2016 10:57 PM ET | Delete
2 Defender please...now fuck off
June 7, 2016 11:08 PM ET | Delete
Free Iggy you fucks
June 12, 2016 9:41 PM ET | Delete
Free me! Fuck the mods!
June 12, 2016 9:47 PM ET | Delete
We need 2 top 4 dmen asap! What happens if the league does another expansion the year after? Should we just continue to ice a shit defense year after year out of fear of losing one of them? Hell no! We need to start winning hockey games this year. Enough is enough. I would prefer to get the D we need now and worry about losing players later. We can protect 8 skaters and a goalie if need be. Or we can work out a deal with Vegas and send them a pick or prospect if necessary to not take somebody from us.
June 13, 2016 5:52 PM ET | Delete
Radical thinking but your d needs all the help it can get now!
June 15, 2016 1:11 AM ET | Delete
Nice blog. That news did add another element. If your the Oilers there are things you need to do. The Sekeras contract is tough and if I were the Oilers I would think about shipping him off to another team for a forward with a bad contract. Sekeras would have to waive his NMC but better than losing someone like Nurse or Klef. I think there is more motivation to go for a draft pick defender. Maybe trading up their second for a late first round. Still the Oilers will have to overpay for a defender. Might as well overpay on a short term deal that bridges a player just past the expansion. For example Yandle at a large price tag might allow the Oilers to keep him. I think either way if you are renting a player you have to concentrate on the UFAs. A guy like Campbell at 37 on a 2 year deal would be good and if he is taken then the expansion team wasted a pick on a defender that is late in his career. Same might be said for Hamhuis. If I were an expansion team I would be poaching young defenders and other teams are in a worse spot than the Oil for this. Our blueline could get poached but I doubt they steal players 35
June 15, 2016 11:41 AM ET | Delete
Some great feedback on this one thank you! @Ihatebrianburke I agree like I said in my last paragraphs I think the Oilers should take the risk and acquire a couple guys the expansion draft just provides a wrinkle that should be considered but not let it prevent decisions. @Hall Fan I do not think Yandle is the way to go. If anything I would acquire him with the intention for an expansion team to pick him up. I would not waste cap hit on him. Like you suggest though an expansion team will be looking more at acquiring young talent than bloated contracts.
Notice to Internet Explorer Users
There is an issue with the form blow that will make it appear that nothing happens when you click the post message button below. To see your message, after you click the post message button, refresh this page. Sorry for the troubles, we hope to have it fixed soon.
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to leave a comment.

Blog Archive

16 "
16 "